Multi-domain probiotic consortium as an alternative to chemical remediation of oil spills at coral reefs and adjacent sites

by Denise P. Silva, Helena Villela, Henrique F. Santos, Gustavo Duarte, Jose Roberto Ribeiro, Angela M. Ghizelini, Caren L.S. Vilela, Phillipe M. Rosado, Carolline S. Fazolato, Erika Santoro, Flavia L. Carmo, Dalton S. Ximenes, Adriana U. Soriano, Caio T.C.C Rachid, Rebecca L. Vega Thurber, Raquel Peixoto
Scientific paper Year: 2021 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-021-01041-w

Extra Information

Microbiome, Volume 9, Article number: 118

Abstract

Background

Beginning in the last century, coral reefs have suffered the consequences of anthropogenic activities, including oil contamination. Chemical remediation methods, such as dispersants, can cause substantial harm to corals and reduce their resilience to stressors. To evaluate the impacts of oil contamination and find potential alternative solutions to chemical dispersants, we conducted a mesocosm experiment with the fire coral Millepora alcicornis, which is sensitive to environmental changes. We exposed Malcicornis to a realistic oil-spill scenario in which we applied an innovative multi-domain bioremediator consortium (bacteria, filamentous fungi, and yeast) and a chemical dispersant (Corexit® 9500, one of the most widely used dispersants), to assess the effects on host health and host-associated microbial communities.

Results

The selected multi-domain microbial consortium helped to mitigate the impacts of the oil, substantially degrading the polycyclic aromatic and n-alkane fractions and maintaining the physiological integrity of the corals. Exposure to Corexit 9500 negatively impacted the host physiology and altered the coral-associated microbial community. After exposure, the abundances of certain bacterial genera such as Rugeria and Roseovarius increased, as previously reported in stressed or diseased corals. We also identified several bioindicators of Corexit 9500 in the microbiome. The impact of Corexit 9500 on the coral health and microbial community was far greater than oil alone, killing corals after only 4 days of exposure in the flow-through system. In the treatments with Corexit 9500, the action of the bioremediator consortium could not be observed directly because of the extreme toxicity of the dispersant to Malcicornis and its associated microbiome.

Conclusions

Our results emphasize the importance of investigating the host-associated microbiome in order to detect and mitigate the effects of oil contamination on corals and the potential role of microbial mitigation and bioindicators as conservation tools. Chemical dispersants were far more damaging to corals and their associated microbiome than oil, and should not be used close to coral reefs. This study can aid in decision-making to minimize the negative effects of oil and dispersants on coral reefs.

 

 

 

 

Keywords

Oil bioremediation Coral-associated microbiome Coral reefs Chemical dispersant Corexit 9500 Millepora alcicornis Coral probiotics Reef restoration